Rich Market Daily
Advertisement
  • Investing
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
  • Investing
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Business
No Result
View All Result
Rich Market Daily
No Result
View All Result
Home Business

Jerome Powell asks inspector general to review Fed’s $2.5B renovation project

admin by admin
July 16, 2025
in Business
0
Jerome Powell asks inspector general to review Fed’s $2.5B renovation project
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Federal Reserve has brought in its inspector general to review a building expansion that has drawn fire from the White House, according to a source familiar with the issue.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell asked for the review, following blistering criticism of the project, initially pegged at $2.5 billion but hit by cost overruns that have brought accusations from President Donald Trump and other administration officials of “fundamental mismanagement.”

“The idea that the Fed could print money and then spend $2.5 billion on a building without real congressional oversight, it didn’t occur to the people that framed the Federal Reserve Act,” Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said Monday on CNBC’s “Squawk Box.” “We’ve got a real problem of oversight and excess spending.”

The inspector general serves the Fed and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and is responsible for looking for fraud, waste and abuse. Powell’s request was reported first by Axios.

In a letter posted to social media last week, Russell Vought, head of the Office of Management and Budget, also slammed the project, which involves two of the Fed’s three Washington, D.C., buildings including its main headquarters known as the Eccles Building.

Vought, during a CNBC interview Friday, likened the building to the Palace of Versailles in France and charged that Powell was guilty of “fiscal mismanagement” at the Fed.

For its part, the central bank has posted a detailed frequently asked questions page on its site, highlighting key details and explaining why some of the specifications were changed or “scaled back or eliminated” at least in part due to higher-than-expected construction costs.

“The project also remediates safety issues by removing hazardous materials such as asbestos and lead and will bring the buildings up to modern code,” the page explains. “While periodic work has been done to keep the buildings occupiable, neither building has seen a comprehensive renovation since they were constructed.”

The Fed is not a taxpayer-funded institution and is therefore not under the OMB’s supervision. It has worked with the National Capital Planning Commission in Washington on the project, but also noted on the FAQ page that it “does not regard any of those changes as warranting further review.”

In separate comments, former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh, speaking Sunday on Fox News, called the renovation costs “outrageous” and said it was more evidence the central bank “has lost its way.” Warsh is considered a strong contender to succeed Powell when the latter’s term as chair expires in May 2026.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Previous Post

Gold Price Update: Q2 2025 in Review

Next Post

Rule Symposium 2025: Gold, Geopolitics and the Real Asset Uprising

admin

admin

Next Post
Rule Symposium 2025: Gold, Geopolitics and the Real Asset Uprising

Rule Symposium 2025: Gold, Geopolitics and the Real Asset Uprising

Recent News

Seabed Mining Heats Up as Lockheed Martin Courts Interest in Pacific Licenses

Seabed Mining Heats Up as Lockheed Martin Courts Interest in Pacific Licenses

July 16, 2025
Rule Symposium 2025: Gold, Geopolitics and the Real Asset Uprising

Rule Symposium 2025: Gold, Geopolitics and the Real Asset Uprising

July 16, 2025
Jerome Powell asks inspector general to review Fed’s $2.5B renovation project

Jerome Powell asks inspector general to review Fed’s $2.5B renovation project

July 16, 2025
Gold Price Update: Q2 2025 in Review

Gold Price Update: Q2 2025 in Review

July 15, 2025
Disclaimer: richmarketdaily.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 richmarketdaily.com | All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Home 1
  • Home 2
  • Home 3
  • Home 4
  • Home 5
  • Home 6
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Thank you

Copyright © 2025 richmarketdaily.com | All Rights Reserved